Muse Ember (Max) vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Muse Ember (Max) by Meta or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Max)
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Muse Ember (Max): 30.8% less intelligence, 1349.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Muse Ember (Max) | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 24.9 | −30.8% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 30.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $117.12 | $1,697.21 | +1349.1% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 14× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 11.49s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Muse Ember (Max)Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill