Muse Glimmer (High) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Beam 1.0 scores 12.8 points higher (30.3 vs 17.5) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($319 vs $146; both mid-range class). Pick Beam 1.0 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Glimmer (High).
| Metric | Muse Glimmer (High) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 17.5 | 30.3 | +73.1% Beam 1.0 is 73.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $145.77 | $318.73 | +118.7% Beam 1.0 is 2.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.76s | 8.02s | −67.6% Beam 1.0 is 67.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Muse Glimmer (High): 73.1% more intelligence, 118.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Muse Glimmer (High)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill