Muse Glimmer (High) vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Mini 4 scores 6.6 points higher (24.1 vs 17.5) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($502 vs $146; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Solar Mini 4 when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Glimmer (High) | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 17.5 | 24.1 | +37.7% Solar Mini 4 is 37.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $145.77 | $502.02 | +244.4% Solar Mini 4 is 3.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.76s | 27.46s | +10.9% Solar Mini 4 is 10.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs Muse Glimmer (High): 37.7% more intelligence, 244.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 10.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Muse Glimmer (High)Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill