Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 14.4 points higher (48.1 vs 33.7) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $1737; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 48.1 | +42.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 42.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,737.18 | $2,000.35 | +15.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 15.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.50s | 84.79s | +334.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 334.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh): 42.7% more intelligence, 15.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 334.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill