Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Step 3.5 Flash

Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetaMuse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Off the frontier
Intelligence
33.70
Total cost
$1737
StepFunStep 3.5 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricMuse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Step 3.5 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)33.716.6−50.7% Step 3.5 Flash is 50.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,737.18Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)21.59s19.80s−8.3% Step 3.5 Flash is 8.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.25 / $4.25$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerMuse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill