Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 14.4 points higher (39.6 vs 25.2) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 25.2, and Qwen3.7 Plus when 25.2 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.6 | 25.2 | −36.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 36.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,385.40 | $427.73 | −69.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 69.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.60s | 47.00s | +128.2% Qwen3.7 Plus is 128.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh): 36.4% less intelligence, 69.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 128.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-2/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-2/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill