Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 7.3 points higher (52.4 vs 45.1) but costs 3.5× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $1655; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 45.1, and Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when 45.1 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 52.4 | +16.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 16.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,655.27 | $5,786.78 | +249.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.49s | 44.47s | +50.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 50.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh): 16.2% more intelligence, 249.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 50.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill