Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Qwen3.8 Max vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh): 10.9% less intelligence, 91.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 127.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 40.2 | −10.9% Qwen3.8 Max is 10.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,655.27 | $3,172.37 | +91.7% Qwen3.8 Max is 91.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.35s | 64.37s | +127.1% Qwen3.8 Max is 127.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill