Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 14.8 points higher (45.1 vs 30.3) but costs 5.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1655 vs $319; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 30.3, and Beam 1.0 when 30.3 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 30.3 | −32.8% Beam 1.0 is 32.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,655.27 | $318.73 | −80.7% Beam 1.0 is 80.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.18s | 7.79s | −72.4% Beam 1.0 is 72.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh): 32.8% less intelligence, 80.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 72.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill