Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 21.6 points higher (48.1 vs 26.5) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($3905 vs $283; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | 26.5 | −44.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 44.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,904.90 | $282.51 | −92.8% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 92.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 59.16s | 6.33s | −89.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 89.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max): 44.9% less intelligence, 92.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill