Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta or Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 21.9 points higher (48.1 vs 26.2) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($3905 vs $1165; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 26.2, and Qwen3.8 27B (Low) when 26.2 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | 26.2 | −45.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 45.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,904.90 | $1,164.93 | −70.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 70.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 59.16s | 58.18s | −1.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 1.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max): 45.5% less intelligence, 70.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill