Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 38.9 points higher (48.1 vs 9.2) but costs 4.9× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $405; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 9.2, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 9.2 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | 9.2 | −80.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 80.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,000.35 | $405.10 | −79.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 79.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 84.79s | 6.44s | −92.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 92.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max): 80.9% less intelligence, 79.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill