Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) scores 13.7 points higher (38.9 vs 25.2) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1185 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Plus.
| Metric | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.9 | 25.2 | −35.2% Qwen3.7 Plus is 35.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,184.90 | $427.73 | −63.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 63.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.34s | 46.20s | +166.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 166.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh): 35.2% less intelligence, 63.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 166.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-open/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-open/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill