Muse Wonder (Max) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 12.2 points higher (52.4 vs 40.2) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $3172; both flagship class). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 Max.
| Metric | Muse Wonder (Max) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.4 | 40.2 | −23.3% Qwen3.8 Max is 23.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,786.78 | $3,172.37 | −45.2% Qwen3.8 Max is 45.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 43.73s | 64.17s | +46.7% Qwen3.8 Max is 46.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Muse Wonder (Max): 23.3% less intelligence, 45.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 46.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Muse Wonder (Max)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-wonder/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-wonder/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill