Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning by NVIDIA or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 16.6 points higher (29.5 vs 12.9) but costs 25× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $92.8; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 12.9, and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning when 12.9 is enough.
| Metric | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.9 | 29.5 | +128.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $92.76 | $2,277.12 | +2354.9% Qwen3.7 Max is 25× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.98s | 16.62s | +85.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 85.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.06 / $0.20 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 128.7% more intelligence, 2354.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Nemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-lightning/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-lightning/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill