Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning by NVIDIA or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 12.3 points higher (25.2 vs 12.9) but costs 4.6× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $92.8; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Plus when you need intelligence above 12.9, and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning when 12.9 is enough.
| Metric | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.9 | 25.2 | +95.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 95.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $92.76 | $427.73 | +361.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 4.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.98s | 47.00s | +423.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 423.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.06 / $0.20 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 95.3% more intelligence, 361.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 423.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Nemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-lightning/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-lightning/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill