Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 3.0 points higher (29.5 vs 26.5) but costs 8.0× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $286; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.5 | 29.5 | +11.3% Qwen3.7 Max is 11.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $286.07 | $2,277.12 | +696.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 8.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.31s | 16.53s | +162.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 162.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.23 / $0.57 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 11.3% more intelligence, 696.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 162.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill