Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 4.9% less intelligence, 49.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 620.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.5 | 25.2 | −4.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 4.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $286.07 | $427.73 | +49.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 49.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.31s | 45.45s | +620.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 620.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.23 / $0.57 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill