Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 13.7 points higher (40.2 vs 26.5) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $283; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.5 | 40.2 | +51.7% Qwen3.8 Max is 51.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $282.51 | $3,172.37 | +1022.9% Qwen3.8 Max is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.20s | 62.08s | +901.3% Qwen3.8 Max is 901.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.23 / $0.57 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 51.7% more intelligence, 1022.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 901.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill