NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 20.6 points higher (29.5 vs 8.9) but costs 36× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $63.7; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 8.9, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni… when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 29.5 | +231.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 3.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $63.74 | $2,277.12 | +3472.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 36× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.29s | 16.53s | +60.6% Qwen3.7 Max is 60.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.05 / $0.20 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning): 231.5% more intelligence, 3472.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill