Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA or Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning): 104.7% more intelligence, 11.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 243.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.8 | 26.2 | +104.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 2.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,318.62 | $1,164.93 | −11.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 11.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.64s | 57.07s | +243.0% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 243.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill