Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) scores 3.6 points higher (12.8 vs 9.2) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1319 vs $405; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 9.2, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 9.2 is enough.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.8 | 9.2 | −28.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 28.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,318.62 | $405.10 | −69.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 69.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.90s | 6.13s | −61.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 61.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning): 28.1% less intelligence, 69.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 61.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill