Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) scores 10.8 points higher (33.7 vs 22.9) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1459 vs $596; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.9 | 33.7 | +47.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 47.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $596.33 | $1,458.94 | +144.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.75s | 64.02s | +334.0% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 334.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.60 / $2.70 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning): 47.2% more intelligence, 144.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 334.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill