Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) scores 13.7 points higher (22.9 vs 9.2) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($697 vs $405; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.9 | 9.2 | −59.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 59.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $696.84 | $405.10 | −41.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 41.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.28s | 6.10s | −60.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 60.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.60 / $2.70 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning): 59.8% less intelligence, 41.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill