o4-mini (High) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

o4-mini (High) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIo4-mini (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Metrico4-mini (High)Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.726.7+59.9% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 59.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)28.44s15.88s−44.2% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 44.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.10 / $4.40$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickero4-mini (High): what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/o4-mini/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/o4-mini/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill