Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) by Multiverse Computing or Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): 24.3% less intelligence, 720.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 11.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) | Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.7 | 20.2 | −24.3% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 24.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $246.48 | $2,022.49 | +720.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 8.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.66s | 13.84s | −11.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 11.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.33 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill