Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) scores 7.8 points higher (15.6 vs 7.8) but costs 4.2× as much to run the benchmark ($661 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 7.8 | −50.0% Solar Pro 3 is 50.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $661.29 | $159.22 | −75.9% Solar Pro 3 is 75.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.36s | 18.36s | −14.0% Solar Pro 3 is 14.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $3.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): 50.0% less intelligence, 75.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 14.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-122b-a10b/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-122b-a10b/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill