Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by Alibaba or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) scores 10.6 points higher (18.4 vs 7.8) but costs 5.9× as much to run the benchmark ($941 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.4 | 7.8 | −57.6% Solar Pro 3 is 57.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $940.97 | $159.22 | −83.1% Solar Pro 3 is 83.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 64.71s | 18.48s | −71.4% Solar Pro 3 is 71.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.60 / $3.60 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning): 57.6% less intelligence, 83.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-397b-a17b/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-397b-a17b/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill