Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0

Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AlibabaQwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
19.80
Total cost
-
ReflectionBeam 1.0Off the frontier
Intelligence
30.30
Total cost
$319
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)Beam 1.0Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)19.830.3+53.0% Beam 1.0 is 53.0% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$318.73— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)12.23s7.79s−36.3% Beam 1.0 is 36.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.60 / $3.60$0.40 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): what beats itBeam 1.0: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-6-27b-non-reasoning/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-6-27b-non-reasoning/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill