Qwen3.7 Max vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 2.9 points higher (29.5 vs 26.6) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $737; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 26.6, and Solar Pro 4 when 26.6 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 26.6 | −9.8% Solar Pro 4 is 9.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,277.12 | $736.82 | −67.6% Solar Pro 4 is 67.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.57s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $7.50 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 4 vs Qwen3.7 Max: 9.8% less intelligence, 67.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Qwen3.7 MaxSolar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill