Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 15.0 points higher (40.2 vs 25.2) but costs 7.4× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $428; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 25.2, and Qwen3.7 Plus when 25.2 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Plus | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.2 | 40.2 | +59.5% Qwen3.8 Max is 59.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $427.73 | $3,172.37 | +641.7% Qwen3.8 Max is 7.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.00s | 64.17s | +36.5% Qwen3.8 Max is 36.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.60 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.7 Plus: 59.5% more intelligence, 641.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 36.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill