Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Step 3.5 Flash 2603 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.9 | 17.0 | −57.4% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 57.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,632.05 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.65s | 19.57s | −69.3% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 69.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.10 / $0.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b/step-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b/step-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill