Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Solar Mini 4
Solar Mini 4 vs Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning): 19.3% more intelligence, 75.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.2 | 24.1 | +19.3% Solar Mini 4 is 19.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,022.49 | $502.02 | −75.2% Solar Mini 4 is 75.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.99s | 23.11s | +65.2% Solar Mini 4 is 65.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.50 / $3.00 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill