Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba or Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) scores 7.5 points higher (33.7 vs 26.2) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1459 vs $1165; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 27B (Low).
| Metric | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 26.2 | −22.3% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 22.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,458.94 | $1,164.93 | −20.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 20.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 64.02s | 55.03s | −14.0% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 14.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.50 / $3.00 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh): 22.3% less intelligence, 20.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 14.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill