Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) scores 25.9 points higher (33.7 vs 7.8) but costs 8.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1336 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 7.8 | −76.9% Solar Pro 3 is 76.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,336.09 | $159.22 | −88.1% Solar Pro 3 is 88.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 58.77s | 18.71s | −68.2% Solar Pro 3 is 68.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.50 / $3.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh): 76.9% less intelligence, 88.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 68.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill