Qwen3 Coder Next vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Beam 1.0 scores 21.1 points higher (30.3 vs 9.2) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($740 vs $405; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Beam 1.0 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Qwen3 Coder Next | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.2 | 30.3 | +229.3% Beam 1.0 is 3.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $405.10 | $739.78 | +82.6% Beam 1.0 is 82.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.52s | 13.31s | +56.2% Beam 1.0 is 56.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.31 / $1.00 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Qwen3 Coder Next: 229.3% more intelligence, 82.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Qwen3 Coder NextBeam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill