Solar Mini 4 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Solar Mini 4 by Upstage or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Mini 4 scores 13.3 points higher (24.1 vs 10.8) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($502 vs $233; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Solar Mini 4 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | Solar Mini 4 | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 10.8 | −55.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 55.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $502.02 | $232.95 | −53.6% Trinity Large Thinking is 53.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.46s | 8.25s | −70.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 70.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.40 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Solar Mini 4: 55.2% less intelligence, 53.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Solar Mini 4Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/solar-mini4/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/solar-mini4/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill