Solar Pro 3 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Solar Pro 3 by Upstage or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Trinity Large Thinking scores 3.0 points higher (10.8 vs 7.8) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($233 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick Trinity Large Thinking when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | Solar Pro 3 | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.8 | 10.8 | +38.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 38.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $159.22 | $232.95 | +46.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 46.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.94s | 8.30s | −56.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 56.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Solar Pro 3: 38.5% more intelligence, 46.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Solar Pro 3Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/solar-pro-3/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/solar-pro-3/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill