Solar Pro 3 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Solar Pro 3 by Upstage or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-22.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Trinity Large Thinking scores 3.0 points higher (10.8 vs 7.8) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($518 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Trinity Large Thinking when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Solar Pro 3 | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.8 | 10.8 | +38.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 38.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $159.22 | $518.07 | +225.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.66s | 9.39s | −52.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 52.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Solar Pro 3: 38.5% more intelligence, 225.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (high) scores 32.10 for $108.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Solar Pro 3Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/solar-pro-3/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/solar-pro-3/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill