Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta scores 5.5 points higher (24.0 vs 18.5) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($397 vs $310; both mid-range class). Pick Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 18.5 | −22.9% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 22.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $310.24 | −21.8% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 21.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 4.52s | −62.6% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 62.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 22.9% less intelligence, 21.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 42.40 for $267.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill