Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 34.3 points higher (58.3 vs 24.0) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($5903 vs $397; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 58.3 | +142.9% Gemini 4 Carbon (Medi… is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $5,903.03 | +1387.5% Gemini 4 Carbon (Medi… is 15× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 12.07s | Even |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 142.9% more intelligence, 1387.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and the same end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGemini 4 Carbon (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gemini-4-carbon-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gemini-4-carbon-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill