Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Granite 4.2 8B
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Granite 4.2 8B by IBM? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta scores 18.9 points higher (24.0 vs 5.1) but costs 8.5× as much to run the benchmark ($397 vs $46.9; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when you need intelligence above 5.1, and Granite 4.2 8B when 5.1 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Granite 4.2 8B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 5.1 | −78.8% Granite 4.2 8B is 78.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $46.88 | −88.2% Granite 4.2 8B is 88.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 18.69s | +54.8% Granite 4.2 8B is 54.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.06 / $0.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Granite 4.2 8B vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 78.8% less intelligence, 88.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 54.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Granite 4.2 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) scores 18.60 for $39.6.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGranite 4.2 8BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/granite-4-2-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/granite-4-2-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill