Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 11.2 points higher (35.2 vs 24.0) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($4722 vs $397; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 35.2 | +46.7% Grok 4.7 (High) is 46.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $4,721.61 | +1089.8% Grok 4.7 (High) is 12× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 33.74s | +179.5% Grok 4.7 (High) is 179.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 46.7% more intelligence, 1089.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 179.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 55.30 for $3746.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGrok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill