Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Inkling 2 Small
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Inkling 2 Small scores 6.6 points higher (30.6 vs 24.0) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($792 vs $397; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Inkling 2 Small when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Inkling 2 Small | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 30.6 | +27.5% Inkling 2 Small is 27.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $791.81 | +99.5% Inkling 2 Small is 99.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 21.95s | +81.9% Inkling 2 Small is 81.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.30 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Inkling 2 Small vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 27.5% more intelligence, 99.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaInkling 2 SmallToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/inkling-2-small · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/inkling-2-small?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill