Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 22.5 points higher (46.5 vs 24.0) but costs 7.9× as much to run the benchmark ($3153 vs $397; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 46.5 | +93.8% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 93.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $3,152.80 | +694.5% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 7.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 89.24s | +639.4% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 639.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 93.8% more intelligence, 694.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 639.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaKimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill