Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 5.6 points higher (29.6 vs 24.0) but costs 5.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2009 vs $397; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 29.6 | +23.3% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 23.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $2,009.23 | +406.3% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 5.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 23.3% more intelligence, 406.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaLing 3.1 Flash 1019Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/ling-3-1-flash-1019 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/ling-3-1-flash-1019?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill