Apodex 1.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 2.1 points higher (26.4 vs 24.3) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $653; both premium class). Pick Apodex 1.1 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Sonnet 5 (Low).
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 24.3 | −8.0% Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) is 8.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $652.70 | −30.5% Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) is 30.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 8.46s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) vs Apodex 1.1: 8.0% less intelligence, 30.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Apodex 1.1Claude Sonnet 5 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/claude-sonnet-5-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/claude-sonnet-5-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill