Apodex 1.1 vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 15.0 points higher (26.4 vs 11.4) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $461; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Apodex 1.1 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25).
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 11.4 | −56.8% DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is 56.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $460.74 | −50.9% DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is 50.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 20.14s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $2.00 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Apodex 1.1: 56.8% less intelligence, 50.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Apodex 1.1DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-r1-0120 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-r1-0120?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill