Apodex 1.1 vs DeepSeek V3 0324
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 16.7 points higher (26.4 vs 9.7) but costs 47× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $19.9; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Apodex 1.1 when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 9.7 | −63.3% DeepSeek V3 0324 is 63.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $19.87 | −97.9% DeepSeek V3 0324 is 97.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 4.96s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.24 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Apodex 1.1: 63.3% less intelligence, 97.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Apodex 1.1DeepSeek V3 0324Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-v3-0324 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-v3-0324?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill