Apodex 1.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Apodex 1.1: 29.9% more intelligence, 78.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 34.3 | +29.9% DeepSeek V4 Flash 073… is 29.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $199.63 | −78.7% DeepSeek V4 Flash 073… is 78.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 17.63s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Apodex 1.1DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-v4-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-v4-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill